Key result
Medical therapy and rehab improve LVEF by ~6 percentage points in biventricular ACM, though arrhythmias persist.
Why the study?
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy may overlap clinically with dilated cardiomyopathy, particularly when left ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction dominate the presentation.
Case Report (n=1)
No
This case report demonstrates the utility of multimodal clinical and imaging assessment in recognizing a suspected biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy phenotype in a patient presenting with dilated cardiomyopathy-like features, while emphasizing caution against overinterpreting genetic variants of uncertain significance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports individualized medical and rehabilitative management in suspected biventricular ACM; leaves open arrhythmia impact and broader applicability.
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) may overlap clinically with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), particularly when left ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction dominate the presentation. We report a 47-year-old man initially diagnosed with DCM whose subsequent multimodal assessment suggested a biventricular ACM (BiV-ACM) phenotype. The clinical assessment integrated clinical history, electrocardiography, ambulatory rhythm monitoring, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Findings included marked left ventricular dilatation, severe systolic dysfunction, frequent multifocal ventricular ectopy, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, right ventricular dysfunction, and biventricular nonischemic myocardial abnormalities on CMR. These phenotypic findings, rather than genetic results, formed the basis of the clinical impression. Whole-exome sequencing performed during follow-up identified four heterozygous variants of uncertain significance, including the truncating DSP variant NM_004415.4:c.7423A>T [p.(Lys2475Ter)]. None provided molecular confirmation. Over approximately 2 years of medical treatment and follow-up, left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 28.9% to 35%, and peak oxygen uptake increased from 24.4 to 26.7 mL/kg/min, while ventricular arrhythmias persisted. These observations do not establish an intervention-specific treatment effect. This case highlights the value of phenotype-based multimodal assessment in DCM-like presentations and the importance of distinguishing uncertain genetic findings from diagnostic evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Suspected biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy presenting as a dilated cardiomyopathy-like phenotype (n=1). Guideline-directed heart failure medical therapy (bisoprolol, sacubitril/valsartan, furosemide, spironolactone, dapagliflozin, digoxin, vericiguat) and individualized cardiac rehabilitation with enhanced external counterpulsation was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2). Medical therapy and rehabilitation increased LVEF from 28.9% to 35% and peak VO2 from 24.4 to 26.7 mL/kg/min over 2 years in a man with suspected biventricular ACM, though arrhythmias persisted.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: