Key result
Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe matches high-intensity statin with ~1-point lower 3-year CV events.
Why the study?
Moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy can effectively lower LDL cholesterol with fewer adverse effects than high-intensity statin monotherapy, but randomised trial evidence comparing long-term clinical outcomes was needed.
Does moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy achieve non-inferior 3-year cardiovascular outcomes compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=3,780)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy achieve non-inferior 3-year cardiovascular outcomes compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
In patients with ASCVD, moderate-intensity rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe is non-inferior to high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy for 3-year cardiovascular outcomes while achieving better LDL-C target attainment (<70 mg/dL) and lower drug intolerance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May offer alternative lipid-lowering approach in ASCVD; leaves open whether it alters long-term outcomes versus high-intensity statin monotherapy.
BACKGROUND Drug combinations rather than increasing doses of one drug can achieve greater efficacy and lower risks. Thus, as an alternative to high-intensity statin monotherapy, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy can lower LDL cholesterol concentrations effectively while reducing adverse effects. However, evidence from randomised trials to compare long-term clinical outcomes is needed. METHODS In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) at 26 clinical centres in South Korea were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy (rosuvastatin 10 mg with ezetimibe 10 mg) or high-intensity statin monotherapy (rosuvastatin 20 mg). The primary endpoint was the 3-year composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or non-fatal stroke, in the intention-to-treat population with a non-inferiority margin of 2·0%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03044665 and is complete. FINDINGS Between Feb 14, 2017, and Dec 18, 2018, 3780 patients were enrolled: 1894 patients to the combination therapy group and 1886 to the high-intensity statin monotherapy group. The primary endpoint occurred in 172 patients (9·1%) in the combination therapy group and 186 patients (9·9%) in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group (absolute difference -0·78%; 90% CI -2·39 to 0·83). LDL cholesterol concentrations of less than 70 mg/dL at 1, 2, and 3 years were observed in 73%, 75%, and 72% of patients in the combination therapy group, and 55%, 60%, and 58% of patients in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group (all p<0·0001). Discontinuation or dose reduction of the study drug by intolerance was observed in 88 patients (4·8%) and 150 patients (8·2%), respectively (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION Among patients with ASCVD, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy was non-inferior to high-intensity statin monotherapy for the 3-year composite outcomes with a higher proportion of patients with LDL cholesterol concentrations of less than 70 mg/dL and lower intolerance-related drug discontinuation or dose reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=3,780). Rosuvastatin with ezetimibe combination therapy vs. High-intensity statin monotherapy (rosuvastatin 20 mg) was evaluated on 3-year composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or non-fatal stroke (Absolute difference -0.78%, 95% CI -2.39 to 0.83 (90% CI)). Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe was non-inferior to high-intensity rosuvastatin for 3-year composite CV outcomes (9.1% vs 9.9%; diff -0.78%, 90% CI -2.39 to 0.83; 2.0% margin).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: