Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Coronary atherosclerosis is shaped by immune, vascular, and metabolic interactions, but genetic links between circulating protein networks and immune-regulatory mechanisms remain incompletely resolved. Methods In an exploratory MR screen using a suggestive instrument threshold, we screened 2,821 genetically proxied plasma protein ratios for association with coronary heart disease (CHD) and evaluated the leading signal using bidirectional Mendelian randomization, two-step mediation analysis, Bayesian colocalization, expression quantitative trait locus colocalization, regulatory annotation, and plasma-based phenotypic evaluation in a case-control cohort. Results A higher genetically predicted MED18/SH2B3 ratio was associated with CHD after Bonferroni correction (inverse-variance weighted odds ratio = 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.18; P = 4.93 × 10 -6 ). The ratio rQTL and SH2B3 protein signal colocalized with CHD at the chromosome 12 SH2B3 locus (PP.H4 = 0.984 and 0.985, respectively). SH2B3 eQTLs also colocalized with CHD in Whole Blood (PP.H4 = 0.937) and EBV-transformed lymphocytes (PP.H4 = 0.932), supporting a blood and lymphocyte context. In 168 clinical participants, the highest ratio tertile remained associated with CHD after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio = 2.81, 95% confidence interval 1.16-7.09). Adding the continuous ratio to clinical covariates increased the AUC from 0.696 to 0.785 (paired DeLong P = 0.013), whereas either protein alone did not significantly improve discrimination. Post hoc subtype-versus-control analyses showed an association for CCS, whereas the AMI estimates were imprecise. Exploratory profiling further identified ratio-group differences in selected hematological indices and circulating inflammatory cytokines. Conclusion These convergent genetic, transcript-level, and clinical findings prioritize an SH2B3-centered immunogenetic signal in CHD. They do not establish a cell-specific immune mechanism and require external and functional validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: