Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When do positive comparisons between perspectives become a system of unitary transformations? For normalized positive block kernels, maximal Hilbert–Schmidt overlap forces exact composition and descent to one shared Hilbert space. This pair-groupoid representation is pure gauge. A sharper result holds when a group organizes the perspectives: a normalized positive-definite function with maximal overlap must itself be a unitary representation. The group is input; the multiplicative realization on local data is output. A gauge-covariant formulation classifies saturated equivariant data by representations up to conjugation. Defect bounds, finite-group rounding, and a ℤ₃ example connect the reconstruction to approximate representations and Bargmann invariants. A random-frame Gibbs model converges to an explicit invariant law on the saturated locus, with a leading mean deficit given by a Morse–Bott calculation. In rank one its energy is the quartic complex-projective spin interaction. A Lean 4/mathlib companion verifies the core reconstruction directly from finite block-matrix positivity in arbitrary dimension, including the finite-group representation law. The proposed contribution is a conditional framework connecting positive quantum comparison, equivariant descent, and statistical selection, with the selection principle stated as an assumption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gustaf Ullman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: