Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: This focused narrative review examines how studies of digitally planned fibula-free flap mandibular reconstruction report outcomes beyond bony accuracy, with particular attention to restorative, functional, and patient-reported outcomes following structural reconstruction. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched for studies on fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction that addressed digital planning, structural outcomes, dental rehabilitation, function, or patient-reported outcomes. Reports were grouped as digital-workflow studies, comparative digital-workflow studies, rehabilitation-context studies, or technical-feasibility reports, and the outcomes described in each report were summarized. Results: The reviewed reports covered structural accuracy, implant or restorative progression, definitive rehabilitation, maintenance or prosthesis use, functional outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes at different stages of follow-up. These outcomes were not presented within a common continuous follow-up sequence, and studies addressing later rehabilitation used different definitions, measurement methods, and follow-up periods. Conclusions: The reviewed reports emphasize transfer of a preoperative plan to postoperative anatomy. Whether these technical advantages translate into completed definitive rehabilitation, sustained prosthesis use, functional recovery, or patient-reported benefit remains unresolved. Future studies should report the full rehabilitation trajectory and reasons for treatment modification or nonprogression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: