Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) remains one of the most troublesome functional complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) represents the standard conservative treatment, a proportion of patients continue to experience bothersome symptoms. Aquatic rehabilitation may facilitate pelvic floor activation through reduced gravitational loading, enhanced proprioceptive input, and trunk stabilization; however, its role in post-prostatectomy incontinence has not been investigated. This prospective pilot study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes associated with hydrokinesitherapy in men with persistent SUI following RARP. Methods: Men with persistent pure SUI after rArP despite three months of standardized conservative management, including PFMT and biofeedback, were prospectively enrolled between January and May 2023. Participants underwent a five-week hydrokinesitherapy program consisting of ten supervised 40-minute sessions performed twice weekly. outcomes included the 24-hour pad test, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short Form (ICIQ-sF), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QoL), International Prostate symptom score (IPSS), IPSS quality-of-life item, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), assessed at baseline, end of treatment (5 weeks), and 12-week follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty patients completed the rehabilitation program without treatment-related adverse events or dropouts. significant improvements were observed at the end of treatment in pad weight, IPSS, IPSS-QoL, ICIQ-SF, and I-QoL scores (all p ≤ 0.01). These improvements were maintained or further improved at 12 weeks, particularly for pad weight, QoL, and incontinence-related symptom scores. overall patient satisfaction was high according to PGI-I. Two patients (10%) subsequently underwent male sling surgery because of persistent bothersome sUI. Conclusions: Hydrokinesitherapy was feasible, safe, and associated with clinically meaningful improvements in urinary continence and health-related QoL in men with persistent SUI after RARP who had not achieved satisfactory recovery following initial conservative rehabilitation. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in adequately powered randomized controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iacovelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: