Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings offer an osteoconductive interface and a mineral reservoir for alendronate. Their pharmaceutical value depends on whether binding produces biologically available exposure without impairing healing. This review examines that relationship in HA–alendronate coatings on titanium. Methods: A structured critical narrative review used PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, with reference-list screening. Screening identified 62 primary studies; contextual literature supported mechanistic and translational interpretation. Results: Adsorption, mineral incorporation, laser deposition and hybrid reservoirs produce different loading and release profiles. Cell and animal findings depend on formulation, dose, comparator and model. Mineral content, bone-to-implant contact and mechanical fixation provide complementary evidence and are not interchangeable outcomes. Human studies have mainly evaluated other bisphosphonates in fibrinogen coatings or alendronate applied as a gel around dental implants. Some reported less marginal bone loss, but improvements in implant stability were inconsistent. These results do not directly establish the efficacy of HA–alendronate coatings. Conclusions: Translation requires reproducible manufacture, measured active-drug availability, preserved physiological remodeling, durable coating adhesion and controlled trials for a defined implant indication. Strong mineral binding alone does not establish effective local therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niculescu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: