Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examines social interaction patterns, income levels and sources, and perceived economic benefits of social networks among coastal fishers in Meureubo, West Aceh, Indonesia. An exploratory qualitative design was employed using observations, in-depth interviews, documentation, and questionnaire data analyzed descriptively. Nineteen informants were purposively selected, including 15 fishers, three toke, and one Panglima Laot. The findings showed frequent interactions among fishers (3.30) and with toke (3.13), but limited interactions with government or community leaders (1.67) and fishers' groups (1.70). Among respondents, 46.7% had high incomes, 40.0% middle incomes, and 13.3% low incomes, primarily from marine catches. Respondents recognized economic benefits from relationships with toke and broader social networks (3.70 each), while fishers' groups received a lower score (2.10). Interviews also revealed potential dependence on individual capital providers. These findings highlight the need to strengthen fishers' organizations, improve price transparency, and expand alternative financing opportunities. No causal relationship between interaction and income was established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erlita et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: