Why the study?
Patients with prior double bioprosthetic valve replacement who develop valve failure require a transcatheter management strategy, and transcatheter double valve replacement in these complex cases requires careful evaluation and planning of valve sizing, aortomitral interactions, access, and residual gradients.
Population
A 73-year-old man with rheumatic heart disease and severe stenosis of prior aortic and mitral bioprostheses
Design
Case report
Follow-up
1-year follow-up
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates successful simultaneous aortic and mitral valve-in-valve replacement with bioprosthetic valve fracture in a high-risk patient, indicating stable hemodynamics at one year.
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement and mitral valve replacement have proved to be a viable alternative to redo surgery in patients who have bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. There is a large subgroup of patients who undergo double valve replacement with bioprosthetic valves, especially in patients with rheumatic heart disease. Failure of these bioprosthetic valves would require a transcatheter management strategy. Transcatheter double valve replacement (TDVR) in these complex cases would require careful evaluation and planning of valve sizing, aortomitral interactions, access, and residual gradients. A 73-year-old man with rheumatic heart disease and prior double bioprosthetic valve replacement in 2014 presented with New York Heart Association class (NYHA) III dyspnea and exertional pre-syncope. He had severe stenosis of a 19 mm Perimount Magna aortic bioprosthesis and a 27 mm Perimount Magna mitral bioprosthesis, with pulmonary hypertension. Computed tomography demonstrated suitable anatomy for transcatheter valve-in-valve treatment. He underwent successful TDVR with a 20 mm MyVal balloon-expandable in the aortic position, followed by a post-implantation valve fracture, and a 27.5 mm MyVal transseptally in the mitral position. The final mean gradients were 15 mmHg across the aortic valve and 6 mmHg across the mitral valve at discharge. At 1-year follow-up, the patient remained clinically well without an increase in valve gradients. Simultaneous transcatheter aortic and mitral valve-in-valve replacement can be performed successfully in selected high-risk patients after meticulous multimodality planning. In patients with a small surgical aortic bioprosthesis, intentional bioprosthetic valve fracture may be an important adjunct to optimize post-implantation hemodynamics. This report highlights the complexity of procedural planning for bioprosthetic valve fracture in a small aortic valve, ensuring optimal hemodynamics and the safety and durability of the Myval transcatheter heart valve in challenging and complex procedures like TDVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajaj et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: