Why the study?
The jailed balloon technique is an effective strategy for side branch protection during PCI for coronary bifurcation lesions, but jailed balloon entrapment is a rare and serious complication that can resist conventional retrieval maneuvers.
Population
A man in his 70s undergoing emergency PCI for a right coronary artery bifurcation lesion
Design
Case report
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May offer bailout for rare side-branch balloon entrapment; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The jailed balloon technique (JBT) is an effective strategy for side branch (SB) protection during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcation lesions; however, jailed balloon entrapment is a rare but serious complication. We report the case of a man in his 70s who was successfully resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation and underwent emergency PCI for a right coronary artery bifurcation lesion. A drug-eluting stent was deployed from the mid right coronary artery to the posterior descending branch using JBT. The jailed SB balloon became entrapped and could not be retrieved despite repeated inflation and deflation, traction, and rotational torque. Further traction resulted in deep engagement of the guiding catheter and an accordion phenomenon of the right coronary artery, raising concern about vascular injury. A balloon was therefore inflated within the stented main vessel, and forward pressure was applied to its shaft to provide counterforce against traction on the entrapped SB balloon. Using this technique, which we termed the "reverse balloon anchoring technique," the entrapped balloon was successfully retrieved without apparent device damage. Final angiography and intravascular ultrasound demonstrated preserved SB flow and adequate stent apposition. The reverse balloon anchoring technique may represent a useful bailout option for jailed balloon entrapment when conventional retrieval maneuvers fail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: