Key result
Omecamtiv mecarbil shows less benefit in HFrEF with prolonged QRS unless treated with CRT.
Why the study?
Prolonged QRS duration portends worse outcomes in HFrEF, and whether QRS duration and the presence of cardiac resynchronization therapy modify the treatment effect of omecamtiv mecarbil in GALACTIC-HF needed evaluation.
Does omecamtiv mecarbil reduce the composite of first heart failure event or cardiovascular death across different QRS duration and cardiac resynchronization therapy groups in patients with HFrEF?
RCT (n=8,089)
Does omecamtiv mecarbil reduce the composite of first heart failure event or cardiovascular death across different QRS duration and cardiac resynchronization therapy groups in patients with HFrEF?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with HFrEF, omecamtiv mecarbil appears less effective in those with prolonged QRS duration who do not have a CRT device, but remains beneficial in CRT-treated patients regardless of QRS duration.
BACKGROUND: Prolonged QRS duration portends worse outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In GALACTIC-HF, omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) reduced the primary composite endpoint of first heart failure (HF) event or cardiovascular death. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether QRS duration and the presence of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) modify the treatment effect of OM. METHODS: GALACTIC-HF enrolled patients with symptomatic HF, HFrEF (≤35%), and elevated natriuretic peptides. Baseline QRS duration was available in 8,089 of 8,232 participants (98.0%), who were classified into 3 groups: QRS duration <120 ms without CRT (n = 3,724), QRS duration ≥120 ms without CRT (n = 3,225), and CRT regardless of QRS duration (n = 1,140). The authors assessed whether the effect of OM on the primary composite endpoint, first HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death differed across these groups. In contrast, among patients treated with CRT, OM was beneficial regardless of QRS duration. CONCLUSIONS: In GALACTIC-HF, OM appeared less effective in patients with prolonged QRS duration who did not have CRT, whereas it remained beneficial in CRT-treated patients. (Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure [GALACTIC-HF]; NCT02929329).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruppert et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=8,089). Omecamtiv mecarbil was evaluated on First heart failure event or cardiovascular death (p=0.009). Omecamtiv mecarbil appeared less effective in HFrEF patients with prolonged QRS (≥120 ms) without CRT (P=0.009), but remained beneficial in CRT-treated patients regardless of QRS duration.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: