Key result
Greater calcification thickness on OCT is linked to smaller lipidic plaque burden on NIRS.
Why the study?
Lipid accumulation in the vessel wall may trigger plaque calcification, and characterizing lipidic plaque components at calcified atheroma could help identify phenotypes with thick calcification that respond poorly to PCI.
Is calcification thickness evaluated by OCT associated with lipidic plaque materials evaluated by NIRS/IVUS in patients with calcified coronary atheroma?
Cohort (n=47)
Is calcification thickness evaluated by OCT associated with lipidic plaque materials evaluated by NIRS/IVUS in patients with calcified coronary atheroma?
Evaluating lipidic plaque components via NIRS/IVUS may help identify calcified coronary atheromas with thick calcification that are at higher risk for stent underexpansion during PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Association between thicker calcification and lower lipid burden remains hypothesis-generating; leaves open whether multimodality imaging refines PCI risk stratification in calcified lesions.
Introduction The degree of calcification and its thickness have been considered to affect stent expansion, leading to an increases risk of repeat revascularization in patients receiving PCI. Pathophysiologically, accumulation of lipidic materials within vessel wall could trigger the formation of plaque calcification. Elucidating characteristics of lipidic plaque components at calcified atheroma may enable to identify phenotypes with thick calcification which less likely responds to PCI. Purpose This study investigated the relationship of calcification thickness with lipidic plaque materials at calcified atheroma by using OCT and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) imaging. Methods We analyzed 52 calcified lesions (culprit/non culprit lesions=44/8) in 47 CAD patients (stable CAD/ACS=36/11) from the REASSURE-NIRS registry (NCT04864171). OCT and NIRS imaging evaluated 4-mm segment exhibiting maximum superficial calcification arc. Calcification thickness on OCT imaging, its arc on IVUS imaging, and NIRS-derived lipid arc were analyzed at every 1-mm interval cross-sectional images. In addition, yellow-calcification ratio (YCR = lipid arc/calcification arc) was calculated (Figure 1). Results 53% of study subjects exhibited chronic kidney disease and 70% of them received a statin (averaged on-treatment LDL-C =89mg/dL). Throughout OCT and NIRS/IVUS imaging analysis of 260 cross-sectional images, the averaged calcification arc, its maximum thickness, lipid arc and YCR were 210° (167–285°), 0.78mm (0.62–0.95mm), 95° (31–169°) and 0.33 (0.09–0.59), respectively. As expected, thicker calcification more likely exhibited a greater calcification arc (r=0.30, p<0.001). Furthermore, a greater thickness of calcification was associated with smaller lipidic plaque burden, reflected by yellow arc (r=−0.36, p<0.001) and YCR (r=−0.36, p<0.001) (Figure 2). After adjusting age, gender and ACS, calcification arc (p<0.001) and YCR (p<0.001) continued to predict thicker calcification. Conclusion Thickening of calcification was associated with severer calcification arc, which was accompanied by the shrinkage of lipidic plaques. Our findings suggest the evaluation of lipidic plaque component as a potential tool to identify calcified atheroma harbouring thick calcification, which may cause a greater risk of stent underexpansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsui et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease with calcified atheroma (n=47). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)/IVUS imaging was evaluated on Relationship between calcification thickness on OCT and lipidic plaque materials (yellow arc and yellow-calcification ratio) on NIRS/IVUS (r = -0.36, p=<0.001). Greater calcification thickness on OCT was associated with a smaller lipidic plaque burden on NIRS, reflected by yellow arc and yellow-calcification ratio.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: