Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Heterogeneous density functional theory (DFT) calculations, particularly plane-wave implementations, introduce systematic formation energy errors ranging from tens to hundreds of meV/atom, depending on the selection of exchange-correlation functionals, kinetic energy cutoffs, pseudopotentials, and dispersion corrections. As demonstrated by the MatPES dataset, identical structures can exhibit an average energy discrepancy of 107 meV/atom between PBE and r 2 SCAN calculations. Such method-dependent discrepancies hinder the integration of multi-source DFT data, greatly limiting the scale and quality of datasets for training robust materials AI models. Here, we resolve this fundamental data silo barrier via graph-based transfer learning. Leveraging 380,190 structurally paired PBE–r 2 SCAN entries from the MatPES database, we train a structure-aware graph neural network to predict cross-functional energy residuals and align inconsistent DFT energy scales. By adopting GPTFF model architecture, the model converts conventional PBE energies to r 2 SCAN-level accuracy with a mean absolute error of 14.3 meV/atom, compared with 18.2 meV/atom achieved by CHGNet. This versatile approach effectively upgrades massive legacy PBE datasets to high-precision r 2 SCAN standards. It enables reliable predictions of phase stability, battery voltage profiles, and reaction thermodynamics, while allowing the integration of multi-source DFT data to advance the development of high-performance materials foundation models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: