Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A bstract In this work, we comprehensively study the total and differential decay widths of the radiative Dalitz decays H → l + l − γ up to QCD next-to-leading order (NLO) accuracy within the framework of NRQCD factorization. Our calculation includes the decays of S -wave states ( η c , η b ) and the P -wave triplets ( χ cJ , χ bJ for J = 0 , 1 , 2) to both electron ( l = e ) and muon ( l = μ ) final states. To match realistic experimental detection thresholds, systematic kinematic cuts are implemented on the final-state photon energy. Our analysis of the lepton-pair invariant mass distribution shows distinct singular behaviors across the multiplets originating from the lepton-pair threshold region, which is regularized by the lepton mass, and the soft-photon region, respectively. For the S -wave states, there is only one peak near the lepton-pair threshold region, while for the J = 0 and J = 2 P -wave states, the peaks show up in both regions. However, for the J = 1 P -wave states, the peak only appears in the soft-photon region. Such features provide a rich venue to probe the γ * → l + l − form factor in heavy quarkonium decay. Integrating over the bounded phase spaces reveals a distinct hierarchy among the χ QJ states in the sensitivity of our theoretical predictions to the soft-photon energy cuts, ordered as χ Q 1 > χ Q 2 > χ Q 0 . In the χ cJ → l + l − γ cases, as the energy cut increases from 100 MeV to 500 MeV the theoretical predictions at QCD NLO are reduced by 6%( χ c 0 ), 66%( χ c 1 ), and 21%( χ c 2 ) for l = e , and by 17%( χ c 0 ), 66%( χ c 1 ), and 39%( χ c 2 ) for l = μ . Comparing our predictions with the upcoming high-precision experimental tests at BESIII will definitely deepen our understanding of the predictive power of perturbative calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: