Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phosphate-treated siwak ( Salvadora persica ) was developed as a calcium phosphate-bearing bioactive material and evaluated for its in vitro enamel remineralization potential when incorporated into a fluoride-free toothpaste. Siwak powder was phosphate-treated with phosphoric acid under controlled conditions and characterized by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Fluoride-free laboratory toothpastes were formulated with phosphate-treated siwak or hydroxyapatite (HAp) as the active material. Twenty independent bovine teeth were allocated to four groups ( n = 5 per group). Surface Vickers microhardness was evaluated at the tooth level, with five indentations averaged per specimen, and analyzed using Welch’s one-way ANOVA followed by Games–Howell pairwise comparisons. Phosphate treatment produced Ca/P-bearing signatures by XRF/EDS together with phosphate-associated FTIR and XRD features. Mean surface microhardness was 265.93 ± 2.12 HV in sound enamel, 127.93 ± 5.93 HV in the post-demineralization reference group, 300.19 ± 5.08 HV after the 7-day phosphate-treated siwak protocol, and 295.25 ± 13.31 HV after the HAp protocol. Overall group differences were significant (Welch ANOVA: F(3, 7.71) = 813.21, p < 0.0001), while no statistically significant difference was detected between the two treatment groups ( p = 0.863). Enamel FTIR showed qualitative condition-associated differences in phosphate-region features. These findings support preliminary proof-of-concept evidence that phosphate-treated siwak can participate in a treatment protocol associated with enamel surface microhardness recovery. Because the post-demineralization reference was measured immediately whereas the treated groups underwent an additional 7-day period in artificial saliva, the microhardness comparisons represent the net effect of the complete treatment protocol rather than the isolated effect of the active toothpaste component.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yerou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: