Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study examines how financial derivative instruments affect the efficiency of corporate risk management in Nigeria, focusing on mitigation of macroeconomic uncertainty and financial risks. Research Methodology: The study adopts quarterly time-series data covering 2016 to 2025. Return on Assets proxies corporate risk management efficiency, while foreign exchange forward contracts, swaps, options, and GARCH-derived exchange rate volatility serve as explanatory variables. Capital adequacy, non-performing loans, monetary policy rate, and bank size are included as controls. The analysis uses the Autoregressive Distributed Lag bounds testing approach, supported by Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares. The study is grounded in the Froot-Scharfstein-Stein Underinvestment Hypothesis (1993) and Smith-Stulz Financial Distress Theory (1985). Results: The findings show a statistically significant long-run cointegrating relationship (F = 5.42, exceeding the 4.26 upper bound). Forward contracts (β = 0.218, p < 0.01) and swaps (β = 0.142, p < 0.01) have a positive and significant effect on banking performance, whereas exchange rate volatility has a significant negative effect (β = -1.642, p < 0.01). The error correction coefficient (ECTt-1 = -0.482, p < 0.01) indicates that approximately 48.2% of short-run disequilibrium is corrected each quarter. Conclusions: Financial derivatives, particularly forward contracts and swaps, are associated with improved banking performance, while exchange rate volatility undermines returns. Limitations: The study is limited to quarterly time-series data for 2016–2025 and the selected variables. Contributions: It offers empirical evidence from Nigeria and provides regulators with insights on strengthening derivative markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikoh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: