Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Supply chain resilience (SCRes) helps firms manage increasingly frequent and severe disruptions, yet its indicators remain fragmented across disruption phases and industrial contexts. Methods: This study presents a practitioner-based assessment of a multi-phase, contingency-based taxonomy of SCRes indicators. An umbrella review identified 41 indicators across pre-disruption, during-disruption, and post-disruption phases. Following conceptual refinement, six were excluded, leaving 35 indicators. Data were collected from 84 supply chain professionals in Morocco using a 10-point importance scale. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the proportion of ratings from 7 to 10, Cronbach’s alpha, and one-way ANOVA. Results: Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88, 0.91, and 0.88 across the three phases. Perceived importance differed significantly across sectors, F(3, 80) = 3.17, p = 0.029, η2 = 0.106. No significant difference emerged between junior and senior respondents, F(1, 82) = 0.60, p = 0.439, η2 = 0.007. Conclusions: The findings suggest sectoral differences in overall perceived importance but do not identify specific sector pairs or establish construct or predictive validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: