Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rising power concentration in artificial intelligence servers has made cooling architecture a primary design constraint for high-density data centres. This paper compares recent peer-reviewed studies of air cooling, direct-to-chip cold plates, single- and two-phase immersion, and their environmental effects. The findings show that liquid cooling expands the thermal operating envelope of high-power hardware, although the size of the benefit depends on the measurement boundary. Direct-to-chip systems can retain a substantial air-side load, warmer coolant may increase server power, and immersion performance varies with flow distribution, fluid properties, and hardware design. Facility-level outcomes also depend on climate, electricity supply, water source, coolant production, and equipment lifetime. Cooling options should therefore be compared under a common workload and system boundary. Optimised air remains suitable for moderate-density or legacy facilities, direct-to-chip cooling provides a practical route for many high-density racks, and immersion is best suited to cases where exceptional heat density and purpose-built infrastructure justify changes to hardware and maintenance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
郁万晓 (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: