Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparison of house screening and insecticide-treated nets priced per bite prevented for a reference child, from a compartment model of outdoor, indoor awake, and indoor asleep biting integrated over six years. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED; nothing was built and no net or screen described was used by any child. Nets prevent 9,182 bites per child over six years at $0.62 per 1,000 bites prevented; full house screening (eaves closed, windows and doors screened, $110.50 per house) prevents 9,625 bites at $6.44 per 1,000; both together prevent 12,964 bites at $5.22 per 1,000 after charging the combination for screening's ventilation penalty (ventilation ratio 0.54, indoor temperature excess +1.24 C, net use 0.75 to 0.57). Adding nets to a screened house costs $1.71 per 1,000 extra bites; adding screening to a netted house costs $16.39 per 1,000 extra bites. The price ranking does not reverse under any single plausible change and reverses only jointly or where screening cannot be installed (unsealable houses, renters).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: