Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED. A model of the bed-net mesh trade-off: woven-screen pressure drop and airflow, logistic mosquito passage versus aperture, insecticide decay, hole accumulation and aperture stretching, and airflow-dependent nightly use, integrated over net life to give bites prevented per child sleeper and a price per bite prevented. Optimum aperture 1.2-1.5 mm (nominal 1.4 mm); replacement at 3.1 years when used-night efficacy reaches 0.70; approximately $0.47 per 1,000 bites prevented per child over that life (6,095 bites prevented against 9,052 with no net). Includes compute.py, the model code that produced every number.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: