Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping mental health services in higher education, and the widespread adoption of anthropomorphic AI is noteworthy. This article employs a literature-based theoretical reasoning approach, integrating parasocial interaction theory, self-determination theory, and uses and gratifications theory to construct a Triggering–Satisfying–Differentiating framework, systematically examining the mechanisms through which anthropomorphic AI affects college students' social psychology. The study finds that AI effectively alleviates loneliness and social anxiety in the short term by enhancing social presence, providing unconditional acceptance, and offering immediate accessibility. However, its "frictionless socializing" experience simultaneously carries three latent risks: substitute gratification weakens motivation for real-world social interaction; idealized interaction raises interpersonal expectation thresholds; and emotional dependence reinforces social avoidance behavior. For students with social anxiety tendencies, the digital haven may evolve from relief to chronic avoidance, hindering essential social skills and resilience. Accordingly, this paper proposes that universities establish "human–AI boundary" awareness, adopt a "reality-first" principle for behavioral guidance, develop connection-promoting AI tools, and build a multi-tiered digital literacy education system. The article aims to provide theoretical and practical pathways for interventions in college students' social development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenyang Wu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: