Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The increasing use of generative artificial intelligence in teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) writing is becoming prevalent, though there is still a gap between writing performance and cognitive and motivational variables. This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, incorporating an individually randomized pre-test/post-test controlled comparison, explored the impact of an eight-week intervention program based on ChatGPT for EFL writing on 300 Jordanian university EFL learners. The subjects were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 150) and control (n = 150) groups following purposive sampling. Writing performance was tested using independent-samples t-tests and ANCOVA, and the relationships between ChatGPT-based learning, critical thinking, self-regulated learning, academic motivation, and writing performance were measured using PLS-SEM. The experimental group demonstrated significantly better post-test performance compared to the control group. There were positive correlations between ChatGPT-based learning and writing performance (β = 0.237), critical thinking (β = 0.456), self-regulated learning (β = 0.341), and academic motivation (β = 0.270) (p < 0.001). The qualitative results emphasized better feedback utilization, revision, autonomy, motivation, and responsible AI usage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wardat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: