Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Winterization of polar ships requires an engineering link between whole-ship airflow and local thermal boundaries. This study develops a one-way, whole-ship airflow-to-convective-boundary mapping framework for exposed superstructure components. Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations using the RNG k–ε model were conducted for MV Xue Long 2 at seven wind directions and inflow velocities of 5–20 m/s. Representative surface-pressure trends were compared with measurements from a 1:400 wind-tunnel model. Source-reported monitoring-point results cover all seven directions from 0° to 180°. Velocities at 18 locations were converted to effective convective heat-transfer coefficients using a project-specific correlation and then supplied to an energy-conservation heat-loss framework. Representative dimensionless local velocities of 0.3–1.6 illustrate shielding and acceleration; they are not the extrema over all cases. For a representative comparison at 10 m/s inflow, local velocities of 3–16 m/s corresponded to correlation-derived coefficients of 31.53–86.35 W/(m2·K), compared with 63.55 W/(m2·K) for a uniform boundary. The resulting velocity and flow-topology information was used to define case-specific, mechanism-based screening zones. A 3.0 m bow fairing reduced the mean deck velocity from 10 to 3.9 m/s and the calculated coefficient by 42.9%. The study therefore demonstrates aerodynamic-to-convective-boundary screening rather than a fully validated bidirectional fluid–thermal or phase-change model; phase-change loads and transferable zoning thresholds require further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: