Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We write the Cooper-pair order parameter in Scretching–Planck (SP) variables as (ψ=√P,eiS/), with charge magnitude (2e) and effective pair mass (m^*). Expressing the Ginzburg–Landau free energy in these variables gives the stationary balance (QSP+12m^*v_s^2+α+β P=0) and the corresponding supercurrent equation. At constant condensate density, the phase equation for the current recovers the London response and penetration depth. Phase single-valuedness yields fluxoid quantization with (Φ_0=h/(2e)=2.0678×10⁻¹⁵) Wb and accounts for Little–Parks periodicity. The gauge-invariant phase difference between two coupled condensates gives the Josephson relations, with (K_J=2e/h=483597.848) GHz/V. The SP amplitude-gradient term determines the Ginzburg–Landau coherence length. The computed normal–superconducting interface energy changes sign at (κ=0.707107), and the single-vortex calculation gives (Hc1/H_c=1.000000) at (κ=1/√2) and recovers the large-(κ) limit. For a disordered niobium model with (κ=1.61), the calculation gives (μ_0Hc1=112) mT. In (d)-wave rings, a net (π) phase shift permits half-integer fluxoid quantization. The momentum-space BCS calculation gives the weak-coupling ratios (2Δ_0/(k_BT_c)=3.5279) and (Δ C/(γ T_c)=1.426). Using the volumetric electronic specific-heat coefficient (γ), the condensation-energy relation (B_c(0)=(Δ_0/k_B)√3μ_0γ/(2π^2)) reproduces the measured critical fields of Al, In, Sn, and Ta within (2.4%). Deviations of (7%) to (15%) for Hg, Pb, and Nb quantify the limits of the weak-coupling estimate for those materials. The free-electron estimates place all eight elements on the type-I side in the clean-limit calculation, including Nb, illustrating the sensitivity of the classification to the penetration depth and coherence length used. Nine solved problems are included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Scretching (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: