Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
European public procurement of construction works has been open to competition across Member States for three decades, yet cross-border award shares remain low. This paper separates two quantities the standard statistic confounds: whether a cross-border relationship exists, and how large it is once it does. The analysis matches 782,673 construction-works awards from 2012 to 2023 to a bilateral gravity data set, estimating a logit over country pairs, elasticities on trading pairs, and a staggered difference-in-differences on verified national transposition dates of Directive 2014/24/EU. Distance deters entry but does not govern volume. Over 2016 to 2020, the years bilateral data cover, 194 of 930 country pairs record any cross-border award: entry falls with distance and rises with a shared frontier, while the distance elasticity of cross-border value, measured on 410 pair-year cells, is indistinguishable from zero: +0.131 against −1.139 for merchandise trade. Transposition changed participation by nothing measurable, and the design is inconclusive. The remedies therefore point at the cost of first entry: the size gradient is consistent with lot aggregation under either a fixed cost of entry or selection into large lots, which are not separated, and mutual recognition of qualification and standard sureties address the same margin unmeasured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali Erkan KARAMAN (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: