Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone stimulation tests (GHSTs) are central to the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) despite recognised limitations. Two failed GHSTs are recommended to confirm GHD; however, a single failed test may be considered sufficient in selected cases. This study aimed to describe GHST practice in a tertiary paediatric endocrine centre, to determine how often an initial subthreshold GHST was not followed by a final diagnosis of GHD and to assess the diagnostic performance of IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. PATIENTS: Seventy-three children who underwent GHST for suspected GHD at a tertiary Irish paediatric endocrinology centre. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical, biochemical and radiological data were reviewed, including height, BMI, height velocity, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, bone age and GHST results. RESULTS: GHD was diagnosed in 34 children (47%) and excluded in 39 (53%). Of 47 children with a first peak GH below 7 µg/L, GHD was subsequently excluded in 13, an apparent false-positive rate of 27.7% (95% CI 16.9-41.8). Six of the 13 had a severely subthreshold initial response (peak GH < 3 µg/L). Discordant results were clustered in peripubertal children. IGF-I had poor sensitivity and specificity (45.5% and 50.0%, respectively); IGFBP-3 had low sensitivity but high specificity (9.1% and 100%, respectively). The IGF-I/IGFBP-3 molar ratio did not differ between diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in four children with a subthreshold first GHST was not ultimately diagnosed with GHD. These findings support the need for repeat testing before initiating treatment in children without independent evidence of pituitary disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Connell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: