Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preferential flow through high-permeability pathways is a major challenge in uranium in situ leaching (ISL) because it can induce hydraulic short-circuiting and reduce the effective sweep of the leaching solution within heterogeneous sandstone aquifers. In this study, a weak-gel system composed of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) and aluminum citrate (AlCit) was investigated for selective hydraulic regulation in heterogeneous porous media, followed by field-scale application. The HPAM/AlCit system exhibited time- and temperature-dependent gelation behavior, enabling low-viscosity injection followed by delayed in situ crosslinking. In parallel sand-pack experiments with initial permeabilities of 9.06 and 2.87 μm2, 350 and 91 mL of gelant entered the high- and low-permeability columns, respectively, demonstrating permeability-driven preferential placement. After gelation, permeability was reduced by 99.59% in the high-permeability medium but by only 31.01% in the low-permeability medium, while the corresponding residual resistance factors were 245 and 1.45. Field injection further confirmed the injectability and hydraulic-regulation capability of the system. The injectivities of two treated wells decreased by 61.4% and 83.3%, respectively, while the average hydraulic conductivity of the test zone decreased from 25.1 to 17.2 m/d, corresponding to a reduction of 31.5%. An inspection well located 3.0 m from the injection well recovered gel-containing cores predominantly within the target sandstone interval, providing direct evidence of meter-scale lateral gel propagation. Overall, the results demonstrate a cross-scale mechanism involving permeability-driven preferential migration, delayed in situ gelation, selective permeability reduction, and hydraulic-resistance redistribution. The proposed approach provides a potential strategy for controlling preferential flow in heterogeneous sandstone aquifers during uranium ISL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: