Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Building on the author’s master’s thesis, this study examines the Interludes (sometimes called Miscellanies) of 3 Kingdoms (LXX)/1 Kings 2.12-46l (MT), a passage where the LXX preserves significant variant material vis-à-vis the MT. While some scholars argue that the differences are the result of midrashic expansion or theological reworking, the evidence points towards the translation of a distinct edition of 1 Kings which originated in Hebrew. As a result, the modern Bible translator is faced with several options and their implications for what “faithful” translation looks like in the case of textual plurality. Should translators favour a dominant textual tradition or preserve multiple readings for future generations? Several options are explored for how to navigate this textual plurality while considering some of the implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. Christopher Adams (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: