Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives: The accurate diagnosis and prognostic assessment of Critically ill patients with pneumonia remain challenging, necessitating the evaluation of multiple biomarkers to enhance clinical decision-making. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), selenium, lactate, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), and peptidyl arginine deiminase 2 (PAD2), and to determine their associations with disease severity and mortality. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted on 130 critically ill pneumonia patients and 45 non-critically ill outpatient controls. Biomarker levels were assessed using ELISA, PCR, and standard biochemical assays, and correlated with severity indices and clinical outcomes. Results: Lactate, PCT, CRP, IL-6, and PAD2 levels were significantly elevated in patients versus controls (p < 0.001), with higher levels observed in non-survivors (p < 0.001) except for PAD2 levels were not significantly associated with survival status (p = 0.346). Although suPAR and selenium differed between patients and controls, they did not distinguish survivors from non-survivors. suPAR correlated positively with PCT, while PAD2 showed significant associations with inflammatory markers and severity scores. No biomarker demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy. Conclusion: Lactate, PCT, CRP, IL-6, and PAD2 exhibit diagnostic relevance in pneumonia. Several biomarkers, including IL-6 gene expression, IL-6, CRP, PCT, and lactate, demonstrated excellent prognostic discrimination (AUC >0.95). However, comparative ROC analysis revealed no statistically significant superiority of any single biomarker over the others, suggesting that a multimarker approach may provide greater clinical value than reliance on an individual marker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhafez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: