Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This systematic review examines Scopus-indexed, English-language, open-access research on policies and governance frameworks for the green economy and low-carbon development. It distinguishes the green economy as the broad transition agenda, low-carbon development as the emissions-reduction pathway, governance frameworks as steering and decision systems and institutional arrangements as implementation structures. Following PRISMA, 182 articles were synthesised through thematic, descriptive and mechanism-oriented analysis. The evidence identifies recurring policy domains, namely energy efficiency, sustainable agriculture, urban sustainability, water and marine protection, climate governance and circular-economy or waste management and recurrent governance functions, particularly authority-resource coupling, coordination, stakeholder participation, monitoring and adaptive learning. The review finds reported achievements in several illustrative cases; however, these examples are interpreted as context-specific mechanisms rather than universal best practices. The main contribution is a conditional evidence-to-action synthesis linking recurrent barriers to governance responses while recognising the limitations of a qualitative, Scopus-bounded, open-access evidence base that was not formally appraised for risk of bias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Handoyo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: