Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates electricity-purchase optimization for a PV-storage microgrid under changing photovoltaic output, load and prices, with storage coupling adjacent intervals. It establishes a unified ten-minute physical and accounting framework and compares four information settings using deterministic linear programming with an MILP cross-check, historical-error scenario programming, finite-state dynamic programming for rolling correction, and scenario programming under time-varying prices. The deterministic schedule costs 35,126.95 CNY, 26.90% below the no-storage baseline. Over 334 days, the historical-error scenario setting costs 14,731,085.32 CNY. Rolling updates at 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00 reduce cost from 16,143,244.46 to 13,905,968.07 CNY (13.86%) and emergency purchases by 81.55%. Under variable prices, intraday updating cuts emergency purchases by 38.69% but raises total cost slightly (0.06%). These results show that the shared framework supports physically consistent comparisons, rolling feedback can mitigate forecast errors, and price updates should be assessed alongside adjustment costs and storage state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: