Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A cashback card paying 1.5% is routinely described as 'free money' for spending the household would do anyway. That description holds only for balances paid in full. This paper simulates a household spending USD 1,400 a month on such a card at 24.9% APR, paying a fixed fraction of each statement in full and revolving the rest, and finds the break-even fraction: below paying 59% of the balance each month, the interest on the revolving balance exceeds the cashback, which is USD 21.00 a month. At a 90% payoff fraction the household already carries a steady balance of USD 159.15 and loses money net; at 80% the net loss is USD 13.70 a month with sign reversed — that is, interest exceeds cashback by that amount. A single month's spending carried for three months costs USD 88.97 in interest, wiping out 4.2 months of cashback. The study is simulated, not measured. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: