Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The household coin jar is defended as harmless thrift: change that would be frittered away is instead gathered. This paper prices the jar against the obvious alternative — depositing the same stream monthly into an account paying 4.0% while inflation runs at 3.0% — for a stated change stream of USD 1.85 a day. After ten years the jar holds USD 5376.49 (after a stated 8% of its contents is lost, spent informally or never redeemed) while the account holds USD 8291.54: a gap of USD 2915.05, or 43.1% of everything contributed. At three years the gap is USD 364.34, confirmed by a stochastic check (median USD 500.92). The jar's cost is not catastrophic, but it is not zero, and it grows with the horizon: the claim that idle cash at home is a neutral place to keep savings does not survive arithmetic. The study is simulated, not measured. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: