Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study explores the future of educational governance in the AI era by examining the development of responsible, inclusive, and human-centered approaches to AI integration in education. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 framework. The final corpus included 71 peer-reviewed studies (2019–2025). Thematic analysis identified 1,226 open codes, five themes, and thirteen sub-themes. A sensitivity analysis of recent 2024–2025 Generative AI studies was conducted to assess thematic robustness, and a foresight approach based on Poli’s principles and Voros’ framework was used to develop educational governance scenarios toward 2040. Based on these findings, a four-dimensional Ecological Framework for AI Governance in Education was developed. Drawing on key drivers and critical uncertainties, four future educational governance scenarios toward 2040 were developed: Human-Centered Intelligent Transformation, Market-Driven AI Dominance, Fragmented Resistance and Widening Gaps, and Adaptive Human-AI Symbiosis. These scenarios illustrate alternative pathways of AI integration, ranging from human-centered approaches to more challenging and risk-oriented trajectories. The results highlight the importance of ethical policymaking, institutional readiness, AI literacy, and the preservation of human agency in future AI-enabled educational governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azarbayejani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: