Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-mix manufacturing systems are vulnerable to stochastic equipment failures, changeovers and bottlenecks that deterministic capacity planning cannot adequately represent. This study develops a hybrid Markov discrete-event methodology for selecting bottleneck capacities in an unreliable serial–parallel multi-product foundry producing aircraft-engine components. A five-state discrete-time Markov chain of a bottleneck machine, derived from model inputs, estimates the stationary shares of processing, changeover, idle time, and two-phase repair and bounds the feasible configurations, whereas an AnyLogic model represents eleven operations, eight finite buffers, three product types, changeovers, and equipment failures. Replacing green-sand molding with cold-hardening mixtures and increasing the bottleneck from one to two parallel machines raised the bottleneck capacity from 15.1 to 26.6 workpieces per hour and reduced the shift-order makespan from 487 to 414 min, whereas a third machine added 5% capacity. Two machines maximized the constrained criterion of productive utilization, makespan, and resource intensity at every loading time, and the monthly plan was met for a cold-hardening yield of at least 0.63; a deterministic calculation overestimated the capacity by 7–49% and accepted a single machine, which, in simulation, completed only 20% of the shift orders within the shift. The chain reproduced the simulated processing and idle shares within 1.5% and, when excluding four of the seven machine numbers, reduced the simulation runs by 57% without changing the selection. Practitioners should validate the unit times, criterion weights, and yield against independent workshop data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikhailov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: