Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate the immediate and long-term outcomes of an improved free skin grafting technique using an antibiotic-impregnated hemostatic sponge placed directly on the wound bed. Material and methods: The results of comprehensive examination and treatment were analyzed in 232 patients with deep skin burns of grade IIIb–IV (grade III according to ICD-10) who were hospitalized between 2016 and 2025. The main study group consisted of 128 patients who underwent the proposed free skin grafting technique (patented invention), involving placement of a 0.5–1.0 cm thick hemostatic collagen sponge (based on type I collagen derived from bovine dermis; pharmacopoeial name: “hemostatic collagen sponge”) impregnated with a broad-spectrum antibiotic solution directly onto the prepared wound bed, followed by placement of a split-thickness autologous skin graft over the sponge. The comparison group consisted of 104 patients who underwent standard autologous skin grafting. Results: The main study group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in autologous skin graft take to 89.1% compared with 71.2% in the comparison group ( p <0.001), a decrease in the incidence of subgraft hematomas and seromas (4.7% vs 15.4%), and a shorter duration of hospital stay. Overall mortality in the main study group decreased to 8.6% compared with 17.3% in the comparison group. Long-term outcomes confirmed the formation of elastic functionally intact skin coverage without pronounced scar formation. Conclusion: The use of the improved free skin grafting technique provides reliable local hemostasis, targeted antibacterial activity, and a statistically significant improvement in functional and cosmetic treatment outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ахмедов et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: