Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) across independent data providers requires local data custody, verifiable evidence handling, and fair compensation for contributed knowledge. We present BC-MultiRAG, a permissioned framework in which providers retrieve locally and release only candidate passages and metadata. Each provider commits to a canonical, domain-separated Merkle root and signs the candidate count, root, task, timestamp, and software version. The shared service verifies these commitments before cross-encoder reranking and generation. Contributions are estimated with Shapley values over a bounded teacher-forced support score. Validity and audited service reliability adjust settlement, while providers with identical node contexts share one credit group. A smart contract enforces budget conservation and records evaluator and settlement state. We evaluate a three-provider deployment on MultiHop-RAG, HotpotQA, and Natural Questions. Provenance verification changed retrieval and answer quality only slightly. The protocol rejected the specified tampering and replay tests at a measured confirmation cost. In a controlled settlement simulation, contribution-weighted payment improved participation and high-quality evidence and reduced allocation disparity relative to a shuffled-contribution placebo. Claims of semantic citation correctness and performance across naturally separate institutional collections remain outside the present evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziyang Zheng (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: