Key result
Microcatheter structural damage during CTO PCI is linked to ~4.1-fold higher periprocedural complications.
Why the study?
Structural failure of coronary microcatheters during CTO PCI had previously been described mainly through passive surveillance, leaving the incidence, predictors, and procedural impact of microcatheter structural damage in contemporary practice uncertain.
Does structural damage of coronary microcatheters increase periprocedural complications and procedural failure in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=2,137)
Yes
Does structural damage of coronary microcatheters increase periprocedural complications and procedural failure in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention?
Structural microcatheter damage occurs in approximately 5.1% of CTO PCI procedures, driven by calcification, tortuosity, retrograde approach, and procedure duration, and is strongly associated with four-fold higher odds of periprocedural complications and procedural failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Microcatheter damage in CTO PCI merits procedural caution; extends prior surveillance but leaves optimal prevention open.
BACKGROUND: Coronary microcatheters are essential in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but their structural failure has mainly been described through passive surveillance. AIMS: We aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, and procedural impact of microcatheter structural damage during contemporary CTO PCI. METHODS: The prospective multicentre CROSS registry included 2137 CTO PCI procedures performed at high-volume centers between 2024 and 2025. Suspected damaged microcatheters underwent centralized assessment and were classified as grade 1 (superficial deformation), grade 2 (significant deformation without complete fracture), or grade 3 (complete fracture). RESULTS: Structural damage occurred in 109 procedures (5.1%); 58.7%, 5.5%, and 35.8% were grade 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Independent predictors of structural microcatheter damage were moderate-to-severe calcification (adjusted OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.27-2.94), retrograde approach (adjusted OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.10-2.67), moderate-to-severe tortuosity (adjusted OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.04-2.50), and longer procedure duration (adjusted OR per 30-min increase, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.30). Structural damage was associated with increased periprocedural complications (25.7% vs. 7.7%; OR: 4.12, 95% CI: 2.60-6.52; p < 0.0001) and failed CTO PCI (11.0% vs. 3.1%; OR: 3.86, 95% CI: 2.01-7.39; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Structural microcatheter damage occurred in approximately 1 in 20 CTO PCIs and was associated with anatomical complexity, demanding procedural circumstances, and substantially worse procedural outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amat-Santos et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic total occlusion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2,137). Coronary microcatheter structural damage vs. No microcatheter structural damage was evaluated on Periprocedural complications (OR 4.12, 95% CI 2.60-6.52, p=<0.0001). Coronary microcatheter structural damage occurred in 5.1% of CTO PCIs and increased periprocedural complications and procedural failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: