Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a space mission design, computed from stated assumptions and not measured, built to measure one quantity: the inertial-sensor precession attributed to the strong-field frame term under test at perihelion, for which the design case adopts 125 milliarcseconds per year equivalent. The instrument is a heat-shielded spacecraft on a highly elliptical heliocentric orbit with perihelion at eight solar radii, carrying a compact gyroscope package and a three-axis accelerometer behind the shield, operating its precision observing plan during the weeks around each perihelion when the field is strongest. It operates from a heliocentric orbit with perihelion at 0.037 astronomical units and aphelion near Venus, period about 150 days for 4 years. The one-day measurement uncertainty is 310 milliarcseconds per year equivalent; averaged over the full mission of 1461 days it falls to 8.11 milliarcseconds per year equivalent, giving a signal-to-noise ratio of 15.4 for the design case and a five-sigma detection limit of 40.6 milliarcseconds per year equivalent. The spacecraft has a dry mass of 670 kilograms, a wet mass of 930 kilograms including propellant, and a total electrical load of 891 watts supplied by a solar array of 0.411 square metres at the operating distance. Every performance figure in this paper comes from the deposited computation; the design is simulated, not measured, and no hardware described here has been built or flown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: