Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a space mission design, computed from stated assumptions and not measured, built to measure one quantity: the differential acceleration attributed to a spin-dependent torsion coupling, for which the design case adopts 6.50e-15 metres per second squared. The instrument is a drag-free satellite carrying two torsion pendulums whose bobs are made of materials with opposite net nuclear spin polarisation, suspended on fused-silica fibres inside a common vacuum housing, with the whole payload slowly rotated so a genuine differential signal appears at the rotation frequency. It operates from a 700-kilometre sun-synchronous orbit chosen for thermal stability and a near-constant eclipse pattern for 2 years. The one-day measurement uncertainty is 3.00e-14 metres per second squared; averaged over the full mission of 730 days it falls to 1.11e-15 metres per second squared, giving a signal-to-noise ratio of 5.86 for the design case and a five-sigma detection limit of 5.55e-15 metres per second squared. The spacecraft has a dry mass of 740 kilograms, a wet mass of 860 kilograms including propellant, and a total electrical load of 1120 watts supplied by a solar array of 3.23 square metres at the operating distance. Every performance figure in this paper comes from the deposited computation; the design is simulated, not measured, and no hardware described here has been built or flown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: