Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gravity Probe B flew four ultra-precise gyroscopes in Earth orbit to measure how the planet's mass and rotation shape the spacetime around it, and its final drift measurements agree with general relativity's geodetic and frame-dragging predictions within their uncertainties. Any additional agent that torques a gyroscope — and an axial torsion background is such an agent, in the class of theories where torsion couples to a body's total angular momentum — would have appeared as an anomalous drift. This paper converts the mission's residuals into torsion bounds. Taking the frame-dragging channel's residual ceiling of 7.8 milliarcseconds per year, an anomalous precession of 1.20e-15 radians per second, the corresponding axial torsion background is bounded at 4.00e-24 per metre; the geodetic channel at a conservative 20 milliarcseconds per year gives 1.02e-23 per metre. The frame-dragging figure is the tightest background-torsion bound obtainable from a gravitational experiment, and it lies a factor of about 84 below the 3.36e-22 per metre that Earth's rotation would source if bulk rotation counted as spin density — so the mission already excludes, at useful depth, the naive picture in which a rotating planet wraps itself in torsion. In Einstein-Cartan theory proper, where torsion couples to intrinsic spin density rather than to a macroscopic rotor's angular momentum, the gyroscopes are predicted to show no torsion drift at all, and none was seen. Computed from stated assumptions, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: