Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a space mission design, computed from stated assumptions and not measured, built to measure one quantity: the phase retardation between polarisation components attributed to the vacuum term under test, for which the design case adopts 3.50e-11 radians of retardation. The instrument is two satellites flying in formation 1,000 kilometres apart, maintaining a common high-finesse optical cavity along the line between them with a polarisation-modulated laser, so the retardation accumulated over the long baseline is read as a phase difference between two polarisation channels. It operates from two co-orbital satellites in a 1,200-kilometre circular Earth orbit, separated along-track for 2 years. The one-day measurement uncertainty is 1.20e-10 radians; averaged over the full mission of 730 days it falls to 4.44e-12 radians, giving a signal-to-noise ratio of 7.88 for the design case and a five-sigma detection limit of 2.22e-11 radians. The spacecraft has a dry mass of 560 kilograms, a wet mass of 655 kilograms including propellant, and a total electrical load of 940 watts supplied by a solar array of 2.71 square metres at the operating distance. Every performance figure in this paper comes from the deposited computation; the design is simulated, not measured, and no hardware described here has been built or flown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: