Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines how residents value access to coastal public spaces in Cumberland, England. Using a survey of 326 residents and a framework that combines Meynhardt’s public value theory with Schwartz’s theory of basic human values, it explores access, use and value. It treats access as part of public value and distinguishes three dimensions of access: formal, practicable and experienced. Respondents valued the coast and used coastal spaces often. Beaches, footpaths and harbours were especially important, and coastal spaces resonated most strongly with statements mapped to Hedonism, Self-Direction, Security, Power and Universalism, reflecting enjoyment, freedom to explore, feeling at ease, pride in place and connection with nature. Respondents overwhelmingly linked time spent in coastal spaces to improved wellbeing and quality of life, and quiet, less developed parts of the coast were particularly valued. Access was viewed as important, yet responses noted uneven paths, unreliable buses and the need for improved car parks, toilets and seating. These conditions can limit access for residents, especially those with impairments and non-drivers. The findings suggest that much of the public value associated with the coast is realised through individual leisure and connection with nature, rather than explicitly communal or duty-oriented activity. They also highlight the importance of maintaining the conditions that enable people to use these spaces. The article concludes with policy recommendations for making coastal access more inclusive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jarratt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: