Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Orthopedic implants can become infected in hospitals requiring additional surgeries and device replacement. The pathogenesis of these device-associated bone infections is fundamentally driven by the transition of opportunistic pathogens from a free-floating planktonic state to a surface-bound, highly resilient biofilm state. Biofilms shield resident bacteria within a self-secreted extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix, making them up to 1000-fold more resistant to conventional systemic antibiotics and host-immune clearance. To overcome the clinical challenges of biofilm elimination, the field of regenerative bone biointerfaces is transitioning from traditional antibiotic therapies toward multifunctional, fully resorbable, dual-therapy biomaterial platforms. These modern architectures are engineered to simultaneously clear localized infections and orchestrate host bone tissue reconstruction within a single surgical window. This review provides a comprehensive categorization and critical evaluation of six breakthrough therapeutic themes shaping next-generation orthopedic scaffolds: (1) spatiotemporally optimized dual or multiple antibiotic delivery networks; (2) integrated antibiotic-osteogenic growth factor/peptide frameworks; (3) mechanistically direct biofilm matrix-disrupting enzyme matrices; (4) localized hyperthermic near-infrared (NIR) photothermal therapy combined with osteogenic scaffolds; (5) intrinsic antibiotic-free antimicrobial metal ion/nanoparticle scaffolds; and (6) alternative biological agent architectures leveraging bacteriophages or probiotic biofilms. This review summarizes the advantages, limitations, clinical potential, and future research directions of each therapeutic platform.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DaMotta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: