Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation (LT) increasingly integrates dynamic tumor biology alongside morphometric criteria. Methods: We developed and externally validated the pre-transplant REcurrent Liver cAncer Prediction ScorE (p-RELAPSE) to predict post-LT recurrence using two retrospective cohorts. Post-LT outcomes of 4420 HCC patients undergoing LT in the US Multicenter HCC Transplant Consortium (UMHTC) were analyzed to derive p-RELAPSE using a competing risks multivariable model, with external validation in 1736 HCC LT recipients from the European Hepatocellular Cancer Liver Transplant (EurHeCaLT) group. Results: The UMHTC training ( n = 2893), internal validation ( n = 1527), and EurHeCaLT ( n = 1736) cohorts showed comparable 5-year overall survival (69.4–71.0%), recurrence-free survival (66.2–66.3%), and recurrence incidence (12.6–14.4%; all P > 0.05). p-RELAPSE incorporated Milan criteria (MC) status, downstaging, maximum tumor diameter, dynamic alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response, and waitlist time. The model stratified recurrence risk even within MC patients. In EurHeCaLT, p-RELAPSE achieved a C-statistic of 0.69, outperforming MC, French AFP, Up-to-7, pre-MORAL, and New York/California models ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: By integrating AFP dynamics and waitlist time, p-RELAPSE refines post-LT recurrence risk stratification, identifying MC patients unlikely to benefit from LT and non-MC patients with favorable outcomes. This externally validated model provides a robust framework for individualized pre-LT decision-making in HCC candidates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: