Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Neonatal outcomes after cesarean delivery under general anesthesia reflect maternal, obstetric, fetal, and perioperative circumstances. We examined factors associated with a study-defined adverse early neonatal composite outcome. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort included 791 neonates delivered under general anesthesia between 1 June 2021 and 30 June 2026. The composite comprised a 1 min Apgar score ≤ 3, a 5 min Apgar score ≤ 5, umbilical arterial pH < 7.20, or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Binomial generalized estimating equations accounted for maternal clustering. Sensitivity analyses examined emergency deliveries, a 5 min Apgar score ≤ 7, alternative pH thresholds, and a composite excluding pH. Results: The primary composite occurred in 69 neonates (8.7%). Placental disorders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.913; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.883–8.131), fetal distress (aOR, 4.403; 95% CI, 2.331–8.316), and gestational age < 32 weeks (aOR, 3.792; 95% CI, 1.852–7.765) were associated with the primary outcome. These associations persisted in measured-pH analyses using thresholds of <7.20 and <7.10. Preterm birth and scarred uterus were associated with a 5 min Apgar score ≤ 7. Conclusions: Selected obstetric and gestational-age factors were associated with adverse early neonatal status. The heterogeneous composite, missing pH, limited events, and retrospective variable selection constrain interpretation; these associations do not establish perinatal asphyxia or causal effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: