Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Evidence on osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. We explored short-term pre–post changes in pain and function observed during an OMT-based program. Methods: In this prospective observational before–after study, 125 consecutive patients with knee (n = 59) or hip (n = 66) OA received 10 individualized OMT sessions over two weeks as routine care. Before and after the program, patients rated pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the unblinded treating therapist completed the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Harris Hip Score (composite patient-reported and examination-based scores, in unvalidated translations); changes were analyzed with Wilcoxon tests, Hodges–Lehmann estimates, and effect sizes (r). Results: In knee OA, median VAS decreased from 5.0 to 1.0 (−4.0 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] −4.5 to −3.5; r = 0.85; p < 0.001), and both KSS parts increased. In hip OA, median VAS decreased from 6.0 to 4.0 (−2.0 points, 95% CI −2.5 to −1.0; r = 0.54; p < 0.001), and all Harris Hip Score components increased. Conclusions: Pain decreased, and composite scores increased during the program, but without a control group, blinded assessment, or follow-up, these changes cannot be attributed to OMT. The findings are exploratory and intended to inform controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antczak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: