Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• Systemic mapping of lock-in and enabling mechanisms in aquatic food systems. • Comparative evidence on cross-cutting and context-specific mechanisms. • Values, policies, collaboration, and funding systems identified as leverage points. • Case-based evidence on interdependencies across leverage points. • Actionable insights to unlock the transformative potential for aquatic food system . Aquatic food systems hold significant potential to address complex social, economic, and environmental challenges, yet their transformative capacity is often constrained by persistent structural, sociopolitical, and institutional lock-ins. Unlocking this potential requires a systems perspective that identifies where change is most constrained and where opportunities for transformation lie. This paper applies a systems-thinking approach to examine transformation mechanisms in aquatic food systems across four coastal communities – Denmark, Greenland, Estonia, and Italy – using qualitative modelling with Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs). By integrating diverse stakeholders' perspectives, we identify both enabling and lock-in mechanisms for aquatic food systems transformation, bridging context-specific dynamics with cross-cutting patterns to generate actionable insights. Our analysis contributes to the ongoing discussion on leverage points for transformation by providing comparative case study evidence on four interdependent leverage points: (i) values that set the direction for governance and institutional change; (ii) coherent policies; (iii) collaboration networks as the social infrastructure enabling alignment of political, institutional, and research agendas; and (iv) adapted funding mechanisms to ensure the enabling environment translates into the adoption and scaling of innovations along the value chain. Grounded in empirical, cross-case evidence, we show how acting simultaneously across different leverage points can maximize their transformative potential. The findings offer practical guidance for designing integrated, context-sensitive, and systemically informed interventions that foster sustainable and equitable aquatic food systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bustamante et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: