Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined how job motivation and organizational commitment relate to the organizational future-proofing capability of the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority in Quezon Province (TESDA-Quezon), and used the results as the basis for a Strategic Organizational Roadmap. A quantitative descriptive-correlational design was used with 120 employees of the TESDA Quezon Provincial Office and its three training institutions, selected through convenience sampling within units. Data were gathered through an expert-validated questionnaire grounded in Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, Meyer and Allen’s Three-Component Model, and de Waal’s High-Performance Organization Framework, and were analyzed using means, standard deviations, Spearman’s rank-order correlation, and multiple regression. Employees reported moderate intrinsic motivation (M = 3.20) but low ratings of extrinsic (hygiene) conditions (M = 2.30). Affective (M = 3.27) and normative (M = 3.02) commitment were moderate, while continuance commitment was low (M = 2.39). Workforce quality was at the established level (M = 3.55); management quality and long-term orientation were developing, while openness and action orientation, and continuous improvement and renewal were emerging. Job motivation (ρ = 0.391, p < 0.001) and organizational commitment (ρ = 0.280, p = 0.002) were significantly and positively related to future-proofing. Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and affective commitment significantly predicted future-proofing, with the two regression models accounting for 17.7% and 15.8% of its variance. The findings informed a roadmap that prioritizes open communication, continuous improvement, management quality, and employee motivation and attachment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lischelle Cañones Sepillo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: