Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Precision feeding can improve nutrient efficiency and reduce the environmental impact of pig production. This study evaluated a restricted blend feeding (R-BF) program based on weekly adjustments of two diets differing in crude protein and standardized ileal digestible lysine concentrations. A total of 520 growing-finishing pigs were assigned to either a conventional three-phase feeding program or R-BF, with R-BF adjusted by BW group. Compared with conventional feeding, observed SID lysine intake was approximately 2–9% lower in light pigs and 2–18% lower in heavy pigs, depending on growth phase. R-BF did not affect feed intake but reduced average daily gain by 5% and impaired feed efficiency, particularly in heavier pigs. R-BF significantly reduced nitrogen intake, calculated nitrogen excretion, and blood urea nitrogen. The low-crude-protein, low-lysine finisher formulation had a 16.6% lower estimated carbon footprint than the conventional finisher diet, resulting in a 3.8% lower feed-related carbon footprint per pig. R-BF also reduced feed cost by up to EUR 4.0 per pig and tended to lower feed cost per kilogram of BW gain under the low-feed-cost scenario. Overall, R-BF reduced nutrient inputs, feed-related environmental impacts, and feed cost per pig, although lower growth performance limited economic efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montalvo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: